Hi everyone. I am about to make the plunge and switch to a rotary rake from a v-rake. I am debating whether to go with a Krone 710 or 810 versus a Claas 750 or 1750.
My questions are:
Transport - our operation is fairly compact and contiguous, so on-road transport is not a critical factor, whereas height can be. Am I going to regret going with tandem transport (710 or 750) over the folding transport offered by the alternative 810/1750 models? The cost saving is neglibile for the tandem transport models it seems, so it comes down to flexibility or quality (i.e. does the single beam support of the fold up model give the edge on strength?).
It seems to me there is little difference between the two brands, however the Claas dealer, formerly a Krone dealer, implied that the Claas rakes were holding up slightly better in adverse conditions. While I don't plan on roughing up the rake, I do not want to have to change equipment out for a good long time. Does anyone out there have experience with both brands and have a preference?
We fight the weather often and need the ability to 1) bump over a row, and 2) bust up a row in the event of untimely rain. Can the rotary rakes bump a row with decent volume? If I raked two passes together (e.g. 44ish feet), will I still be able to bump over a row? Have any of you tried tedding out a rotary formed row? Tedding out a row twisted up by a v-rake is a nightmare, and I hope a rotary rake will give me a slight edge if other options fail.
Has anyone out there managed to bust up a Krone or Claas on heavy volume, if so, what were the conditions? I think my neighbor was busting his Kuhn rotary on irrigated triticale and I am wondering if that was just extreme conditions (rough fields, high ground speed), or if volume can be a problem for rotary rakes.
Lastly, our 4[sup]th [/sup]cutting is typically very light and heavy short stemmed alfalfa. Am I going to see significant loss with a rotary over a v-rake? My worst fear with a rotary is leaving half of my late cutting in the field.
Any thoughts are appreciated. Thanks!
My questions are:
Transport - our operation is fairly compact and contiguous, so on-road transport is not a critical factor, whereas height can be. Am I going to regret going with tandem transport (710 or 750) over the folding transport offered by the alternative 810/1750 models? The cost saving is neglibile for the tandem transport models it seems, so it comes down to flexibility or quality (i.e. does the single beam support of the fold up model give the edge on strength?).
It seems to me there is little difference between the two brands, however the Claas dealer, formerly a Krone dealer, implied that the Claas rakes were holding up slightly better in adverse conditions. While I don't plan on roughing up the rake, I do not want to have to change equipment out for a good long time. Does anyone out there have experience with both brands and have a preference?
We fight the weather often and need the ability to 1) bump over a row, and 2) bust up a row in the event of untimely rain. Can the rotary rakes bump a row with decent volume? If I raked two passes together (e.g. 44ish feet), will I still be able to bump over a row? Have any of you tried tedding out a rotary formed row? Tedding out a row twisted up by a v-rake is a nightmare, and I hope a rotary rake will give me a slight edge if other options fail.
Has anyone out there managed to bust up a Krone or Claas on heavy volume, if so, what were the conditions? I think my neighbor was busting his Kuhn rotary on irrigated triticale and I am wondering if that was just extreme conditions (rough fields, high ground speed), or if volume can be a problem for rotary rakes.
Lastly, our 4[sup]th [/sup]cutting is typically very light and heavy short stemmed alfalfa. Am I going to see significant loss with a rotary over a v-rake? My worst fear with a rotary is leaving half of my late cutting in the field.
Any thoughts are appreciated. Thanks!